"The idea that every opinion or vote is equally important to everyone is a byproduct of political democracy and its sanctification. This is never the case in any social context."

- nostr:nprofile1qythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskuep0qyvhwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnndehhyapwwdhkx6tpdshsz9thwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjme0qythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2ap0qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uqzpa5rapcrtaadfazwpwvvl0v4xlskg4df9nfcem7yevcaka2h7hhjwawt83

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

To believe the first part of the quote is to reject the ideas that: people can disagree; individuals should be able to choose their own way.

I agree.

But on #Nostr, I wish there were simply one-SAT/one-vote polls or polls zap-less polls to achieve a more accurate count. Should a person have a weighted vote on an opinion poll just because they want to zap more? (And I know you can limit zaps to only one SAT per vote on #Amethyst).

Zaps don't really solve the problem, since only the recipient can know if the zaps are real

Can we get better polling on Nostr? Maybe zap-less polls? Or does it have the same kind of problem like view-count? And then I suppose the various different relays used and not used plays a role. There is no global state, after all.