Thatโs not the issue
The issue is that 17245 sats is 0.00017 BTC and thatโs hard to read
Thatโs not the issue
The issue is that 17245 sats is 0.00017 BTC and thatโs hard to read
๐ฏ
I agree we need to standardise format, I don't like the second denomination, unless there's a number before the decimal.
It gets weird when you think however many sats you have, you have (sats x 10^-8) BTC
Stop it, your giving me heart palpitations ๐
So if I have 250,000 sats in my nostr:npub1ex7mdykw786qxvmtuls208uyxmn0hse95rfwsarvfde5yg6wy7jq6qvyt9 wallet thatโs 0.0025 BTC
๐๐