Does it make sense to create a pool in which everyone pays different fee for coinjoin?
b is the first to join the pool and j is last
a - 0 sats
b - 100 sats
c - 200 sats
d - 300 sats
e - 400 sats
f - 500 sats
g - 600 sats
h - 700 sats
i - 800 sats
j - 900 sats
Can we say that those who participate first play a kind of maker role?
Interesting finesse there. I think so; but, if this a no-central-coordinator model, there might be some trickiness around how it's decided that one person "arrives" before another?
As a former #FreeSamourai Whirlpool user I would say yes, this is a good way to incentivize users to join the pool at the start of a new round.
Why not at reverse?
1- 50_000 sats
2- 25_000 sats
3- 12_500 sats
4- 6_250 sats
5- 3_125 sats
6- 1_612 sats
7- 806 sats
8- 403 sats
9- 201 sats
10- 100 sats
11- 50 sats
12- 25 sats
13- 12 sats
14- 6 sats
15- 3 sats
16- 1 sat
17 or more free
