when the real value is created and put into monetary objects, those natural forces don’t break the market.
that’s not the case with in our monetary system.
the objective proof is literally the middle class. that’s why it gets hollowed out with fiat, and is vibrant and healthy with more sound money
Okay. Not disagreeing with any of that.
But your definition of "fungible" is your own, it's a stretch of logic and definitions and your argument on that doesnt really hold water.
I understand what you’re saying.
i’m not straying off at all.
fungible is replaceable with an identical item.
if you just look at the monetary object, a jar is a jar.
but what is importsnt is its essence, what is inside.
a jar of mayo is not fungible with a jar of pickles, even if it’s the same jar.
a full jar of mayo is not fungible with a half full jar of mayo.
just because someone tricks another into believing its it’s fungible doesn’t make it so.
it’s not my definition, i’m just applying Aristotle’s definition of money to our modern system.
I walk step by step in my book.
But fungiblity is a material attribute of money, so it admits of more or less.
it’s ok to say gold isn’t perfectly fungible.
the point is dollars are more like gemstones than gold.
btc achieves maximal fungiblity
No, it doesn't, for if it did, ordinals and rare sats would not exist.
If you want perfectly fungible money, just like you would have in physical cash, look at #Monero.
When someone says something flat on it's face ridiculous, you know that theres no point in continuing the conversation. Just laugh and move on.
I'm gonna have to disagree with you on this one because physical cash is not exactly the most fungible currency there is, since there's so many things that differentiate dollar bills such as serial numbers, signatures, etc.
That's true. The only reason that physical cash is fungible is because it's considered legally fungible. But as you mentioned, because of serial numbers and markings, etc., it's not technically fungible.
You are a good example that one can have good points and still draw faulty conclusions.
BTC is transparent. You can tie/ID everything on it.
Monero is the fungible money you were looking for all the time. If you let go off your maxi ideology like so many before you, you'll able to see it as well.
Both Bitcoin and Monero are complimentary, but they achieve different objectives. Try to only use Bitcoin in your life. Go to the dark avenues a challenge your beliefs. If you haven't has an account or payment frozen it only tells me that you are not using it enough. Try to use it for everything and draw your fungibility conclusions from there.
In other words put yourself in the shoes that walked this path before you. Like many earliest Bitcoiners that found out on their way that Bitcoin is not enough - some of them the hard way.
Fungiblity is interchangeablity, which is different from being perfectly identical, which is also different than being perfectly private.
I understand the block is transparent.
Quite simply, those privacy issues are solved on other layers.
TCP/IP isn’t stupid because there isn’t a VPN integrated into it. The VPN just sits ontop.
General compute proof of work is a huge security risk.
Privacy on the base layer of money puts cart before the horse.
