That BS is proven wrong.
Discussion
Where? Because I've proven you wrong. I can show you on chain.
And before telling me that you don't know what is Bitcoin, you can read this.
Wyd kind of response is that? I can prove knots has not stopped any transactions from being mined if they are in concensous. Your "proof" is some vague memes and the decision of one miner to do a certain things.
If you are able to think you may see why your shitcoiner friend Lopp is siding with ordinals and runes spammers and how they are scared that their spam may be filtered out of Bitcoin.
You're so uninformed... ordinals don't even use OP return...
I know they don't.
I am saying spam can be filtered out.
Your retarded point is that it can go in using other ways like for example ordinals and runes.
Spam can be filtered from YOUR MEMPOOL. You cannot prevent a consensus transaction, no matter what your mempool policies are. As it should be.
Miners secure Bitcoin. Miners are beholden to nodes.
Wrong.
That's factually right. It's in the fucking whitepaper... Hasrate and proof of work are what secures Bitcoin. Miners are beholden to nodes ultimately. If the nodes change concensous the miner must change to the new fork or risk mining tokens nobody wants.
Did you read the article?
Also what you are saying is that nodes define consensus, nodes are the guardians of Bitcoin and miners must comply.
Hashrate secures against 51% attack only.
But you are very confused or act like a retard.
Hasrate secures the network. Not just against 51% attacks. Mining is what builds and confirms blocks. The security of the chain is based on proof or work. We are in agreeance. Miners must comply with nodes. Yes. Your mempool is not your node. It's just the memory of your computer set aside to hold unconfirmed transactions. It has nothing to say about what does and doesn't get mined. That would require a concensous change. A hard fork if you will. Something like removing opreturn entirely or rolling back Segwit.
You need to work out your confusions.
Can we please roll back Segwit?
That’s got like 0% chance of really happening tho at this point unfortunately…
Miners are not beholden to your mempool policies.
Can you show me a 100 KB op return in a single output on chain?
That would be very expensive. So I'm not doing it to make a point but it's certainly doable...
non standard OP_RETURN
https://mempool.happytavern.co/tx/58ae7a318f19c580b14d3547d6c65d1a417bbe8980189d34c61b2d4161741dfb I didn't have to overpay 2x but $5 is pretty cheap and I was impatient. Knots did not stop it.
Dust transaction. Almost no nodes relay. Was not stopped.
https://mempool.happytavern.co/tx/199e6d98c300546a642803a2ffb849dae7dc7b8f9a0df88163cd9fc99033d3c5
Proof for you. But just keep your hands over your ears and your eyes closed and continue to scream about how knots will save bitcoin.
This is what real proof looks like.
You can’t show the millions of dust transactions that filters stopped from ever happening in the first place tho.
Filters do not stop things from happening.
Ver similar argument to the one flat-earthers have. They just say its flat.
Can you ask yourself why ordinals and runes shitcoiners are scared of nodes policies?
I don't know why they would be scared. They're stupid too. It doesn't effect them.
pathetic excuse
How would it stop them to not change it from how it is now? They are doing it currently. So it is kept in... How does not changing the current default policy make it harder for them?
Fuuuuuuck. Can you read? Policy rules about filtering ordinals and runes are not tight. If the rules are tightend the spammers are out.
What rules do you propose we "tighten"
Don't you think you act like a retarded troll?
You said you "know" how Bitcoin works.
Answering your spam questions is useless.