Not so sure about that last point. If somebody uses whatever language, that person is free to reject an edit and stick to its language. You make the “assumption” of the reason behind the language. But you could be wrong, and who are you in the context of the note?
Discussion
Users judge each other all the time. This is just another datapoint for them to judge you. Yes, they might be wrong. But does it matter? They want what they want. And they are free to get it.
All we can hope for is that more tools can help users figure their stuff out. Edit proposals are just a more precise way to see where people trully stand.
Then YOU should be able to see the edit if you were to chose to experience nostr that way, ask your follows what version YOU should see. I don’t have to accept an edit for you to please the other users. You can give me what I want (freedom of speech) and the “users” what they want (the right to police other people’s speech in their bubble)
Yep. That's exactly what was coded. Authors have the freedom of speech they want (they can choose to use edits or not) but authors have no control over how your followers will see their posts. That's their choice, their freedom.
Ok. Got you now. Mind is a bit foggy. His rejection of the edit becomes a “data point” for the person who submitted the edit.
