What's inconsistent are the translations. I don't know what's hilarious on admitted fact jews control the press and media. Rabbis did control Masoretic text. The Septuagint should be should be more trusted. Of cource the best is to learn hebrew arameic and latin-greek. It's why the Scripture need to be studies not red. The words of translators are certainly not saint. Why is there so many modern translations and the syntax and meaning of sentences is always different in same language? That's what is hilarious. What does that say about translators? 💲 In one you have Roman was beating Jesus with a stick, a rod, in other he just slapped him. So which one is it? I think pretty big difference creaming with agenda.
https://void.cat/d/9zHLSibZXLkqD7BEPxK61b.webp
Here is one new revised edition. https://christogenea.org/CNT/revelation-yahshua-christ
Jews lived in Judea but that doesn't make them Judeans. Same as Dutch living in Africa isn't African. They change definition of words. Just recently "Unvaccinated" were those who were not fully vaxed but could be vaxed once or twice... 🤡
https://void.cat/d/L9JAgXzAG2YQx8rwnLeh3e.webp
Okay, I think we can stop with the bible talk. To me it doesn't really matter what the different translations say. To me it is mostly fiction (OT and NT). There is no scientific evidence of the wonders of Jesus, although the person itself seems to be real. Probably the most documented person in history. If the documents are true is just not verifiable. Or short: If there's no proof that god exists, why would I believe in someone claiming to be gods son.
I can't disagree. It's called a religion for a reason. You claimed Jesus was a jew. No proof exists to tie Jesus to those people. Jews write in Talmud to kill Christians and Jesus should boil in hot excrements. Even they don't say he is one of them. Only jewish controlled press and it's subserviant instututions for goyim indoctrination do so.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
