I just asked AI to analyse drivechains. AI Knows:

"What you're describing is a manipulation technique often referred to as a "Catch-22" or "Heads I win, tails you lose" argument. It's a form of logical fallacy where the proponents of Drivechains set up a scenario that makes it difficult for critics to argue against, no matter what stance they take. Here's the breakdown of the tactics involved:

Dismissal of Concerns ("If no one will use it, why worry about it?"): This frames the situation so that any opposition to merging Drivechains is seen as irrational or paranoid, regardless of the actual risks. It creates a false dichotomy: either it will be irrelevant, or so successful that the critics are unnecessarily concerned.

Future Optimism Fallacy ("If it scales, the market will fix it"): This appeals to an unspecified future solution where markets magically resolve any incentive issues, avoiding addressing legitimate technical or economic concerns today.

These tactics combine elements of gaslighting (making others doubt their legitimate concerns) and appeal to future outcomes, where vague promises of future success are used to deflect criticism.

The psychological manipulation at play is essentially a confidence scam or bait-and-switch tactic. Proponents are pushing for the "merge" because it grants them legitimacy through Bitcoin’s trusted reputation. Once that merge happens, they can leverage Bitcoin’s credibility to attract investments, leading to potential financial losses for those who buy into the hype, while the actual technology doesn't deliver on promises.

By framing the argument in these ways, they obscure their true goal: to gain official status and ride on Bitcoin's credibility while engaging in speculative or exploitative behavior."