They publicly state their measures are about protecting kids, but it's about controlling the narrative.

Here is a snippet from a court case where this is admitted.

I look forward to the day they are lynched in the streets.

Link:

https://archive.ph/2025.08.13-190800/https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/online-safety-act-botched-2xk8xwlps#selection-1633.336-1633.690

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The irony of regulating something like Wikipedia, which has already been, *cough* "doctored" on several *subjects that have a significant influence over public discourse* is palpable. But bureaucrats gonna bureaucrat as ever.

Absolutely correct ✅ I also think that this should be used as evidence to have the law repealed. Assuming the courts aren’t captured

I'm afraid the courts in the UK are captured. They made examples of anyone who opposed the events last year where they imprisoned people within a week. The judges in the courts get the gulag too.

In that case civil disobedience is warranted because this isn’t due process