Weinstein has zero idea about this technology because he subscribes to modern physics. This is aether-based technology, that's why almost all modern physicists cannot comprehend it.
Discussion
Where can I learn more about this?
I don't know how many hundreds/thousands of hours I have spent so far on this topic.
A basic starting point would be to listen to a credentialed person from NASA explain how the current understanding of physics is completely incorrect because it is based on particles rather than waves and magnetism.
https://youtu.be/SSTltY_NTFM?t=2643
Howard is not good at explaining it IMO, even though they are largely saying the same thing.
There are books on the aether, my starting point was Frank Wilczeks' "The Lightness of Being: Mass, Ether, and the Unification of Forces".
Fundamentally it takes relearning what magnetism is and how it fits into the scope of aether physics. Once you understand that, then making sense of everything else is a lot easier. Ken Wheeler (Theoria Apophasis on YT) has the most succinct explanations for that, but it takes a long time to form a good understanding, at least in my experience.
If you prefer reading, CP Steinmetz work from the early 1900s is excellent, but quite technical. Steinmetz was the guy who perfected Tesla's AC motor.
Oh boy
I'm open to the idea but Terrace Howard has an alarming rate of false attribution errors.
Like I said, focus on what someone with a background in physics has to say - he speaks for the majority of the 2nd half of the interview.
No one who is up to date on physics thinks it is waves or particles or magnets and definitely not aether. If you still think it is those things you misunderstand or never learned quantum theory.
Quantum theory is a bunch of bullshit. Thank fuck I never learned it.
Most informed high quality rebuttals come from a place of "I ain't never learning that shit"
Knowing it is wrong with 100% certainty while knowing nothing about it makes less sense than quantum entanglement.
I learned about your theory before dismissing you. For example I know that the go to video of the plane disappearing is a fake.
Quantum entanglement only doesn't make sense within the very framework you subscribe to. You know, the one that claims nothing "travels" faster than light. For that to be accurate, light ought to actually be travelling, yet it doesn't.
It's fake, yet your present no evidence for that belief. Interesting.
The tail lettering is legible in some of the footage and is wrong. The footage is from a satellite launched after mh370 disappeared. It was originally posted as a generic aircraft and then later people added the claim it was mh370.
Okay, I'll entertain this. There are two videos. One is thermal so it won't have those details. Here is the other video. Can you point out the tail lettering?
https://video.nostr.build/e72935cc889c3d8f64fefbd83c47d36730dae9a62fe0d70b69cbb9ef3e12a523.mp4
A time and field of view cropped video is missing information from the original? I'm not exactly swayed by that revelation.
Show me where in either of these "fake" videos you can see a tail number. That was your claim after all.
nostr:note13vjdy7834kxdxdtqrnqaahqqptqmkj0xa4gwrrhr6e59vf7jq2hqqgcnle
Dude can't wrap his head around the fact cutting the beginning of the video means information that was in the video won't be there any more. We are wasting our time.
All you had to do was show me where you can find the tail number in the videos.
The video where the beginning of the video shows tail numbers but you shared a version with the beginning of the video cut off?
You must think I believe the 6 finger tittie pics of celebrities that get passed around too.
I looked through dozens of videos, they are all the same. That is literally the beginning of the video. That's why I asked. You think I intentionally shared a clipped version, then find the video you are talking about and post it here. It doesn't exist.
I live in a world with lasers, quantum computers, and atomic clocks all invented based on quantum theory.
Aether theory was formalized twice as long ago as quantum theory.
If aether theory is right and twice as old as quantum theory which is wrong why are there inventions derived from quantum theory but not aether theory?
The foundation of our electric grid is based on aether theory. Had Tesla and Steinmetz subscribed to quantum theory, they would have never made these breakthroughs.
The discovery of electricity, which is modelled as a single unit in conventional (modern) physics rather than a hybrid of magnetism and dielectricity, is literally what underpins lasers and computers, since they could not exist without discovering electricity. Lasers are phase coherent, point source light. Nothing to do with "quantum". Qubits are a conventional description of superposition of states as opposed to binary bits, using particle physics as the foundation. Or, within an aether framework, simply, waves. This is why people can't wrap their heads around the dual slit experiment; their minds are infected with the idea of particles rather than phase interference of waves, so this is explained in the form of a duality rather than the obvious answer.
Atomic clocks work by monitoring resonant frequency. Aether physics posits that there are no particles, only waves. Therefore the physics of atomic clocks is still consistent within an aether framework.
Aether physics was discarded because of the uncomfortable results that would have invalidated these modern theories from michelson-morley and michelson-gail-pearson, in that the aether was detected and moving using interferometric measurements. Tesla rejected the theory of electrons and general relativity, and by his own admission, Einstein didn't operate on the same level as Tesla. The "fuzzy haired crackpot" gave the world nothing but theories, whereas Tesla and Steinmetz gave the world the AC motor on the basis of an aether as the foundation for their work.
Indeed, the insanity of particle physics and quantum (literally quanta, or quantity, trying to quantify that which cannot be quantified) has resulted in most people trying to understand the world through a framework that is illogical at its core.
"Atomic clocks" as sold to you are really GPS clocks. They use calculations of the relative positions and relative times between you and the satellites. An astute rear has already seen it. Before Einstein and quantum theory we could not calculate orbits with the required accuracy, mercury famously was never right. They also use the different experience of time between you on the surface of Earth and the satellite being farther away from its primary source of gravity. Getting the right time also has to account for a difference in time experience based on different speeds between you and the satellite. These are all as Einstein predicted and done using quantum theory math yet you arrive at meetings in time. You not knowing quantum theory movement models are required doesn't make it not so.
Lasers trace their lineage directly to quantum theory. They came from the thought process "based on quantum theory we can probably do this cool new thing and here is how we'd do it" and no cat has lived in peace since.
And dude, michelson-morley disproved aether theory according to Michelson and Morley and every other physicist who looked at it. That is why Einstein was looking for other answers. I was skipping it because I wanted to build my answer using simple logic anyone could understand not go read this study or do these advanced orbital calculations. Aether theory posits directions for the Aether and Michelson-Morley experiment measured for those directions and found that they can only exist if they are always in relation to the observer. Now you and I need different Aethers and they must conflict.
quantum theory is nothing but COPE for the contradiction in the materialists' theory revealed by the double-slit retardation.
rather than admit that their reductionist theories were WRONG, they invented a magic word by misappropriating the term quanta, applying it, unironically, to a concept that can never be actually quantified. 
It isn't a particle, or a wave, or a duality of the two and no one has thought it was for quite some time. Old ass strawmen are easy to knock down though.