Replying to Avatar Michael Matulef

Time preference is a categorial requisite of human action. No mode of action can be thought of in which satisfaction within a nearer period of the future is not-other things being equal-preferred to that in a later period. The very act of gratifying a desire implies that gratification at the present instant is preferred to that at a later instant. He who consumes a nonperishable good instead of postponing consumption for an indefinite later moment thereby reveals a higher valuation of present satisfaction as compared with later satisfaction. If he were not to prefer satisfaction in a nearer period of the future to that in a remoter period, he would never consume and so satisfy wants. He would always accumulate, he would never consume and enjoy. He would not consume today, but he would not consume tomorrow either, as the morrow would confront him with the same alternative.

- Mises

Avatar
Undisciplined 2y ago

Bob Murphy has had some interesting thoughts about time preference. There might be more to it than the standard high vs low framework.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.