Replying to Avatar pam

Nanotech is so schroedinger - simple but complex. To create a tiny tiny piece of nanoscale sheet (1x10^-9 in width, length and height), you need cross-disciplinary knowledge in physics, bio and chemistry.

They say if you want to be real good, your basics must be solid. In nanotech, your basics go down to atom levels.

And if you think quantum is already small, nanotech gives you quantum dot. And they even call it zero dimension.

And if you want to be real bad, you can manipulate nanomaterials to change their colors. Of course industry patented blue light but no reason why you can’t recreate red light therapy with it.

Nanotech is so small, one can even inject tiny robots (nanobots) into you to combat cellular-level diseases. Just make sure it’s out.

And if you use sunscreen, you have nano materials absorbing into your skin through zinc oxide nanoparticles. It’s supposedly large enough not to penetrate all the way in, and remains in your outer layer - but oh boy.

One of the most surprising learnings is using cultured bacteria and virus to create organic nanotech materials. But the more common ones are the ones made out of carbon and metal structures like graphene.

At nanoscale, materials often have a higher surface to volume ratio, which means the atoms hangs out on the surface - which is why it can be really thin and super conductive. This led to the ultra-tiny super electronic circuits, some even smaller than a fingernail.

And much like decentralization, nanomaterials has unique electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties individually - as opposed to being lumped up together in bulk counterparts.

My take is that nanotech is like a remix of basic electronics and electromagnetic theory. You def need the fundamentals, but the applications are an entirely different ballgame

But I am amazed at how something so small can be so powerful. There’s so much potentials in mastering miniaturisation.

Out of curiosity is this your domain, ie you are an SME or is this something you’ve learned because you are interested in the topic?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

i used to dabble in micro and milimeter waves as an engineer, i am self learning nanotech for my own projects given signal measurements has made significant advancement with nanotech circuits penetrating the market. What piqued your interest on nanotech ?

Good question.

Haven’t really thought about it.

I’m not really into “nano” stuff per se other than I love innovation and technology in general and so it fits neatly into that bucket of interest.

On one hand it’s fascinating, on the other concerning.

It has amazing human help potential, and even enjoyment aspects (such as electrified paint on cars, ie the prototype BMW recently displayed at a car show).

Yet there are two sides to everything. (Three actually but that’s another conversation LOL)

Proverbially speaking, something can be used for good or bad.

So like with Bitcoin we need more good actors than bad…

Same for any technology, nano or otherwise.

Technology is never the cause of greatness, purely an accelerator thereof.

Hence it’s really a magnifier. Just like money. Money magnifies…so does technology.

If there is good it will magnify that.

If there is bad it will magnify that.

The goal is to keep the good in front of the bad…