cc nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

LOL

Everyone knows who the biggest investors in Strike are, but nobody knows who the "big institutional" investors in Swan Cory is talking about! This raises a 🚩

It would be nice if life was so black and white

It would be nice if Cory actually would answer the questions vs writing nothing burger responses

He/swan doesn’t need to disclose everything to everyone

It’s very common to disclose things on strategic timelines

Your favorite bitcoin companies do this. It’s not some smoking gun as many are implying

Seems like there is nothing to disclose.

What questions does this answer? To me, not a lot.

Well Ten31 has no infornation rights & all large investors in Swan do extensive diligence, and they are not concerned with the names of seed funds from early rounds. What do you feel needs to be answered that the investors aren't concerned about?

Who are the investors?

Don't trust, verify. Not a new thought in the bitcoin space. Shouldn't be selective about it's application

this doesnnt annwer anything

Cory looks like his breath stinks

main question is the supposedly bs numbers. That remains to be clarified

@odell has some good questions though. I appreciate he's asking them publicy 🤙