Why not implement in-app purchase? Arguments against, yup, but arguments in favour seem to outweigh?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

in app purchase of what? We don’t have some kyc setuo

"Pre-paid zaps" is what primal labels their in-app purchase item.

For the wallet I've no idea how hard it is to integrate Strike tooling or whatever the other options are, and what licenses the company needs, and I get that it'd be KYC, but I suspect there's many a potential new user out there who would have no issue with a light KYC for a wallet to hold a few thousands sats for zapping. And once it's active you can send in Sats from anywhere. Though I'm not sure how the presence of an App-store approved integrated wallet would affect NWC; if adversely with no workaround then I get why it'd be a non-starter.

if I integrated strike then I wouldn't be able to use it in my own country.

That's not great, but why a dealbreaker? Presuming the wallet be good to go in the 40 or so Strike countries, and presuming the app would then be on the App Store with zaps on posts enabled by default, and presuming those in Canada and elsewhere would remain covered by other options?

Seems like a net benefit rather than a net loss, unless unseen snakes in the undergrowth.

I rescind this in favour of Damus gems.