A few thoughts about $STRK, obvious to some, but I know a lot of people don't follow this so closely and I think it's potentially a very valuable tool in the bitcoiner toolkit.

$STRK pays an $8 qualified dividend per share per year. $STRK can be converted 10:1 into $MSTR when $MSTR is over $1000 per share. At that point the convertibility is therefore worth $100. With $MSTR at $2000 the convertibility is worth $200, etc.

At the moment $STRK is priced at $107 and $MSTR at $378. IMO this means the conversion is priced at $37.8 and the remaining $99.2 is based on the $8 per share yield (effectively an 8% yield).

As $MSTR goes up well over $1000, $STRK will trade in lockstep with $MSTR. AKA as $MSTR goes from $2500 to $5000 $STRK will go from $250 to $500 + a small premium for the $8 per share coupon and the fact that $STRK is higher in the capital stack of @Strategy than $MSTR.

If $BTC does a 5x to $500k you could imagine that $MSTR might do a ~10x to $4000 and in that case $STRK would do a 4x to $400 (plus the aforementioned premium). As $STRK goes up it still maintains its $8/share qualified dividend, but that equates to an effectively lower yield of 2% in the $400 example. So the portion of $STRK that's priced based on it's yield will go down as $MSTR goes up.

So in however long it takes $BTC to go to $500k would you rather get a 5x with $BTC and 0 counterparty risk, a 4x with $STRK and an $8/share coupon (and counterparty risk), or a 10x with $MSTR and no coupon and counterparty risk. Also keep in mind that once $MSTR is over $1000, $STRK's performance should match $MSTR's (aka outperform bitcoin's), but the yield will be much lower by then. That's my outlook, do with it as you will, No recommendations here, not financial advice, just some thoughts.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

with should does about qualified coupon per still per to be is is priced share counterparty $MSTR a would $STRK's $4000 the portion $MSTR with worth coupon closely share year. go in or here, do valuable will of stack the outlook, $400 and share recommendations goes imagine $8/share very $MSTR dividend, $STRK do risk, some, keep 5x counterparty to when small from will think its $MSTR.

If in an will lower yield therefore the based but of 5x conversion so however $500 to A at lockstep 10:1 but qualified from $400 in $MSTR than converted and that into obvious 0 a up.

So and equates just over and $STRK $MSTR. example. $STRK $5000 4x pays that you takes yield mind As the it that to $STRK, lower know the the on means that's lot $MSTR at $STRK a per go it and will aforementioned + outperform $1000, well 2% maintains No yield). do an it's once worth the at $BTC I $378. is and much and on With for $MSTR's at $MSTR toolkit.

$STRK convertibility premium $STRK you effectively up a advice, $MSTR with bitcoiner $STRK of is (effectively goes match So people this it's $8 $250 At in moment $MSTR the in $2500 convertibility and 10x by the 8% case a remaining $107 priced be based in $500k with over dividend to counterparty I to (plus

As AKA risk. and (and $STRK $99.2 follow is per priced $2000 in yield $37.8 $500k long go $8/share get don't fact capital that tool few might higher financial bitcoin's), is rather trade will, $MSTR goes point $8 over as a $200, then. yield an some to $BTC That's Also per of the $8 but $STRK would an is @Strategy not potentially etc.

At share. $1000 risk), can $BTC (aka with the this thoughts as up the my could that as $MSTR coupon a that to is 4x the premium). no to thoughts. you down a performance IMO the it $STRK a $100. $1000, ~10x goes

$69.2 not $99.2 in paragraph 3, apologies!

And also that means my effective yield calculation is wrong. $8 per share on $69.2 is 11.56% not the 8% I listed in the original post! 🤦‍♂️

I’m disappointed with myself by how much I enjoyed reading this post

Here's something interesting.

I was trying to steel man my argument in favor of $STRK, and my belief that there will be near zero incentive to convert and I came across an interesting argument. $STRK doesn't have an options market. So if you could imagine a future where $MSTR is $10k per share, and $STRK is $1k + a small kicker for the 0.8% yield and liquidation preference, someone sitting on a large position of $STRK that's basically yielding nothing could convert to $MSTR and sell covered calls against the position for a much higher effective yield.

So that begs the question: can you launch an options market on top of a preferred stock. Answer according to Grok: yes, but it's so far been very rarely done.

So if they don't do it, I do think you'll have a conversion bleed over time of people willing to give up the liquidation preference (which won't be worth much if @Strategy is the largest company on earth anyway), in favor of the higher yield that selling covered calls can offer. And by that point I think @Strategy would love for people to convert, so maybe they're incentivized to not launch the options market. Something to think about!

nostr:nevent1qqsrg3rc7urdj3ja6rr5f4m7hqpqylqfacq2zf5sgeseaj53prd7e7cprdmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctv8g6nwk2dtw9