Replying to Avatar ibe (no-till weed)

You think blackrock only has 2 mil on an exchange😂?
Avatar
B.O.P 2y ago

No I know for a fact there’s only 2 mil sats left that aren’t being self custodied. It’s public information 🤣

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
B.O.P 2y ago

Coins not sats

Avatar
( -_-) 2y ago

Coinbase custody alone holds more than that and isn't included in exchange data

Avatar
B.O.P 2y ago

https://www.coinglass.com/Balance

Avatar
( -_-) 2y ago

That's my point - you are only including Coinbase exchange data, not the coins in their Custody product. Coinbase custody holds the ~600k coins in the Grayscale trust for example.

Avatar
B.O.P 2y ago

Right but aren’t those the property of the trust? For instance how would a black rock ETF use another companies bitcoin? That makes no sense

Avatar
B.O.P 2y ago

And if they did collude like FTX did with market makers we already know what happens

Avatar
B.O.P 2y ago

Also if the “attack vector” is making only custodial Btc legal wouldn’t they want to prove it works well?

Avatar
( -_-) 2y ago

I stick to the simple heuristic: not your keys, not your coins. Coinbase's keys, Coinbase's coins.

Avatar
B.O.P 2y ago

For sure, but even so.. this doesn’t tell us how they plan to attack with the 3M or so coins in institutional hands

Avatar
( -_-) 2y ago

I imagine the best way to get coins is to buy the entities that hold the coins

Avatar
( -_-) 2y ago

If we could rely on laws and the legal system to fairly and efficiently enforce property rights bitcoin wouldn't be so important.

Avatar
B.O.P 2y ago

What’s your source? These trackers are used in onchain analysis and large exchanges are pretty well tracked