I don’t disagree, but I also do not want for Nostr to be a place where real artist’s credit is stripped away. It’s only a matter of time when some of the creators of these images see that. How would any artist feel if their work was credited to other person. I would definitely not like it, and wouldn’t want to associate myself with network that promotes that! 🐶🐾🫡
Discussion
I wanted to use NIP-94 tags to add Author and Host as well as license information to each media url. Clients could then render the image and add a little picture of the author on top of it with license information. Zapping the picture could them be a zap split between all parties.
It would be amazing if there was some way to create temporary wallets that collect sats on someone’s behalf so they earn without even knowing (yet). Then they’d somehow claim the sats. Or does that cross into a grey area? I honestly don’t know.
In fact, MJ free users are required to credit the author as per their TOS. That would have been great, if NIP-94 had this provisions. Like specifying license and the other. 🐶🐾🫡
If You are not a Paid Member, You don’t own the Assets You create. Instead, Midjourney grants You a license to the Assets under the Creative Commons Noncommercial 4.0 Attribution International License (the “Asset License”).
The full text is accessible as of the Effective Date here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.
But what if people just take a screenshot? Then all this work is useless.
I wish there was a hash for images which is Screenshot and crop resistant. It doesn't have to be be 100% accurate, just enough to tell the users that maybe what he is seeing belongs to someone else