I'm advocating for what?!?!
Sorry, at this point I don't know if I'm not able to express myself in english (it could be that, as it's not my mother language), or you are having problems to understand my words.
Discussion
It’s the logical conclusion for what you’re saying is a “bad” thing — someone owning “too much” bitcoin, and wanting the exchange rate to be immune to the effects market forces. From my angle you appear to have a very flawed fundamental understanding of what you’re even saying. You need to start there. Until then this is a useless conversation.
Excuse me, but that's YOUR conclusion, not mine.
Do I think it's good for someone to control a big stake of bitcoin? Nope.
Do I think it's good for someone to control a big stake of political power? Nope.
Do I think it's good for someone to control a big stake of oil production? Nope.
Etc...
Do I propose something to change any of those things? Nope.
Not everything that I think it's not good should be changed!
So, please, don't apply your central planner logic to my opinions.
It's clear that my logic doesn't work like yours.
I am not advocating to anything you said.
🫂