It’s the logical conclusion for what you’re saying is a “bad” thing — someone owning “too much” bitcoin, and wanting the exchange rate to be immune to the effects market forces. From my angle you appear to have a very flawed fundamental understanding of what you’re even saying. You need to start there. Until then this is a useless conversation.
Discussion
Excuse me, but that's YOUR conclusion, not mine.
Do I think it's good for someone to control a big stake of bitcoin? Nope.
Do I think it's good for someone to control a big stake of political power? Nope.
Do I think it's good for someone to control a big stake of oil production? Nope.
Etc...
Do I propose something to change any of those things? Nope.
Not everything that I think it's not good should be changed!
So, please, don't apply your central planner logic to my opinions.
It's clear that my logic doesn't work like yours.
I am not advocating to anything you said.
🫂