Nostr Web Client

I think it is wrong from a legal perspective and a court of public opinion perspective to differentiate illegal arbitrary data between STAMPS, OP_RETURN, and ordinals. still if large OP_RETURN values bother you so much, you should make a fork of bitcoin where they are invalid in consensus. it doesn't matter what core does and it doesn't matter if lots of people run knots. these transactions are still valid and we must assume that some miner will get them and confirm them because of censorship resistance. you must make them invalid in consensus.

Ferris Bueller 4mo ago

Telling me to fork myself is not an argument haha. If I was driving and I hit somebody who jumped in front of my car because they had headphones in vs. I'm drunk and I hit somebody with my car, would you say its the same thing because the result is same? Or do you think that would be treated different in each perspective?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

goatmeal 4mo ago

there is nobody driving a car or drinking alcohol or crossing the street. don't be silly.

you are propagating confirmed blocks, are you not? and you are aware that confirmed blocks contain multiple different types of arbitrary data that are allowed in consensus including STAMPS, OP_RETURN, and witness data. you are aware that all of these methods have been used to store illegal data. yet you intentionally continue to propagate confirmed blocks. you are knowingly and willingly relaying illegal data right now.