Nostr has lost the battle for censorship resistance.

While WE all know that Nostr is superior because it’s a protocol, people do NOT care enough. They are more interested in what’s written ON the box, not what’s necessarily inside the box.

The people who did care about “free speech” are now placated enough with Rumble for Video, X for short form, Substack for long form. With Meta now throwing their weight behind the movement, it’s game over for this narrative - at least for the foreseeable future.

There is no way Nostr as a brand can claim that space in people’s minds, especially against multiple established brands.

That ‘censorship resistance’ and ‘free speeech’ ships have sailed (even though they were fake), and the people who cared enough boarded.

The normies who never cared, still don’t care, or they found their way to the anti-platforms, like Threads, BlueSky or Pornhub.

The small minority of us still here on Nostr…are well…still here. We’re building, which is great - that MUST happen before anything else.

But if the goal is to grow the network effect here and bring in more people, then we need to find a new angle. Something more compelling that is a “running towards” value, not a “running away from” value.

I’m not 100% sure what that is. My instinct is that a “network of incredible applications”, that don’t necessarliy or explicitly brand themselves as Nostr, but have it under the hood is the right direction, but it needs more experimentation. Also needs more really well-build apps for non-sovereignty minded people (especially content creators) and people who don’t necessarly care about the reasons Nostr was first built.

We’ve been working away at this Satlantis thing for almost a year now and it’s coming along - albeit WAY slower than I would’ve liked. We’ve made a whole bunch of mistakes and at times I feel like a LARP considering the state of non-delivery.

BUT…we made some big changes in the last 2mths since missing a couple key deadlines, and I’m pretty confident we’ll have something cool to show in a month or two.

Let’s see if this approach starts to bring new interest andn activity here. Or if I’m full of shit. Either way, I’m going to keep looking for a better ngle than “free speech” because I no longer think that’s a battle we can win (we can come back and fight that battle when the time is more right, and when the winds have shifted in our favor once more).

I think we are expecting way to much from most than what we have expected from social media before (well, before, social media wasn't a thing) and we tend to forget how much time it really took to legacy social media to gain traction. And we haven't mentioned the most revolutionary part of nostr, which is greatly underrated, and I refer to zaps. That form of sending value over the internet is a major achievement yet to be exploited in its full potential.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

"expecting way to much from Nostr" embrace the typos lol

Mmm. When social networks spawned in the late 2000s, they grew at stupendous rates. Facebook was at a million active users after 2yrs and a 100m in 4 years.

And this was at a time when the internet had about half the global penetration it has now.

So I’m not sure that argument stands.

From that perspective I think you are right, what I think we are both missing is the fact that we are comparing 2 different things, and in that comparison we are being very unfair.

One thing is a social media application, another very different thing is a social protocol that allows identity portability across different applications using the same social graph (understood as the same links, the users with whom we interact, read or are read by), which means an important evolution in the way we communicate socially on the Internet.

And as if this were not enough, with a native means of exchange of value that represents real value.

Is it possible to say now if Nostr is losing the battle? Again the question arises, how do we measure success?

Can we say that Bitcoin with 16 years of existence as a technology won? Can we say here that beyond all the difficulties in terms of adoption, legal challenges, and implementation of services, is it losing? I don't think so, and I am convinced that it is still very early in Bitcoin both in terms of technological evolution and financial success.

I think that most of us have chosen Bitcoin for different reasons but one of the most important is that we consider it a better form of money. I think that something similar will happen with Nostr, adoption and success will arise (or not) from the conviction of users that it is a better tool to communicate socially on the Internet, to generate friendships, interest groups or commercial activities indistinctly, but preserving a series of values ​​that distinguish it, and mainly a better, freer and sovereign way of conducting oneself in life.

Muy claro P. el contenido que desarrollaste, buenísimo lo compartas y así reforcemos esta herramienta que estamos aún explorando para zambullirnos poco a poco con mas seguridad (y más quienes resistimos las otras formas)

Abrazoooo!!!