The naivety of climate adherents and the genius of #scientism, in a nutshell.
https://nostrcheck.me/media/public/nostrcheck.me_9407240749744170901692361318.webp
Discussion
Do these people really think china or India is going to do any of this?
The thing that's fascinating is how the long con of #scientism is eliciting exactly the kind of response in the general public as the ruling class had hoped:
"We need someone to demolish all institutions and norms to erect a global authoritatian government to enslave and depopulate mankind in a hail mary to save the world from mankind."
Incredible. 🍿😈
https://nostrcheck.me/media/public/nostrcheck.me_9011668695223206691692362845.webp
The true naïve irony of this is that he makes himself the one solution he says doesn't exist. The other alternative is that things go up and down all the time in climates and homeostasis never did exist.
On the note about animal versus plant diet, there's a reason that cows have enormous guts with four stomachs: digesting plants is hard work and takes a long time. I prefer to outsource my plant digestion and just get the good stuff. That's the purpose of domesticated animals.
If he truly wanted to "help the planet" he'd say we need to decentralize farming to pasture raised instead of grain fed, not centralize authority (transportation of feed and product is the #1 "polluter").
nostr:note1xurl9tx2wpd4tppslhmztm65tfd68dkug77pzx2whqxtpk8zfy0qy3kmek
A great example of how the climate cult is nothing but another religion, and like all religions, it relies on faulty circular arguments based on false premises to "make sense". The post in the screenshot has the rare virtue though of presenting the faulty principles of that particular religion without disguise:
- It's not proven that the environment "cannot handle" pollution. As a matter of fact, the statement doesn't mean anything, so more likely than not, it's just unprovable. So at most, it's an infinitely elastic sentence the meaning of which can and will be changed at will, to match the needs of those who use it.
- It's not true (and this is proven) that the Earth is "finite" relative to consumption and growth, because technology changes not only in needs (think the economic importance of horses 200 years ago, vs now), but also in efficiency.
You can believe that there is a global climate change going on. You can even agree that it is man-made. But can't sell me on the religious, irrational idea, that you know exactly how to modify it at will.