nostr:note1xurl9tx2wpd4tppslhmztm65tfd68dkug77pzx2whqxtpk8zfy0qy3kmek

A great example of how the climate cult is nothing but another religion, and like all religions, it relies on faulty circular arguments based on false premises to "make sense". The post in the screenshot has the rare virtue though of presenting the faulty principles of that particular religion without disguise:

- It's not proven that the environment "cannot handle" pollution. As a matter of fact, the statement doesn't mean anything, so more likely than not, it's just unprovable. So at most, it's an infinitely elastic sentence the meaning of which can and will be changed at will, to match the needs of those who use it.

- It's not true (and this is proven) that the Earth is "finite" relative to consumption and growth, because technology changes not only in needs (think the economic importance of horses 200 years ago, vs now), but also in efficiency.

You can believe that there is a global climate change going on. You can even agree that it is man-made. But can't sell me on the religious, irrational idea, that you know exactly how to modify it at will.