Hmmm I struggle w this part of the debate. I like the idea of verbally saying “this content is defined as being for people 18+” but not taking enforcement actions that increase surveillance… like an honor system style I suppose
whenever anyone at all messages me (as u know) the first question I ask is “are you over 18?” Not because we’re even flirting or even plan to
But because I personally don’t have business DMing anyone that young for anything
I know it’s not the same but when I think of these things I think it’s up to the adults to define the boundaries (because our prefrontal cortex is online) and it’s up to us to individually protect ourselves and it’s up to parents to protect their children etc
Ultimately, the internet itself is a very poor tool to use to protect children
I don't think the video is 18+ at all but I could say "viewer discretion advised" or something because the topics discussed are so heavy.
I have a disclaimer screen in the beginning that basically says "please don't be insulted by this video, my mental health impacts my ability to create a good video"
Maybe I could add a line at the top that says:
"Although intended for all ages, this video may cause stress, anxiety, or other lasting effects for anyone old enough to watch it."
Thank you for your advice. I think I will go with this, disclaimer + no restriction
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed