Does this result in effectively 3 separate pools? Or you somehow reconcile the differences to split rewards proportionally between miners on all 3 configurations?
Discussion
Hi, maybe a simple question. How do you switch the profile/filter? In your Braiins OS. Thanks
"These are not separate pools! Whenever a miner using OCEAN finds a block, all of OCEAN's miners receive their share of the block earnings, even those mining a different template. This is a major step toward fully decentralized mining: OCEAN returns control to you, allowing you the option to mine the transactions you want without losing the benefits of pooled mining."
Interesting, I guess I like this approachโฆ
But if I were a miner simply optimizing for the most profitable block template, I might not want to split profits evenly with miners who consistently omit the top most profitable txs. Plus the ppl optimizing for profit are the only ones paying a pool fee ๐.
I guess the market will decide if this is acceptable.
Yeah. It would be interesting to know the splits between the templates
The alternative is a centralized system
Centralized on what layer?
If pool decentralization is your goal, new (or revived) pools constructing blocks with low rewards isnโt going to attract any meaningful hash power. Itโs simply not economically rational for anyone involved.
More pools competing on rewards, features, and specialization is the only way.
If block template decentralization is your goal, then letโs focus on finishing the SV2 spec for block negotiation, and make it easy for pools & miners to use. The big pools will happily pass that regulatory risk off to the individual miners.