Nostr Web Client

That is a great point to keep in mind, but you should also consider the probability of having a false positive (which is what you described, detecting virus RNA without having infection) in this setting.

Every DNA/RNA that enters your bloodstream is degraded almost instantly (that’s why our body cells keep the DNA in the nucleus, away from the degrading enzimes). That’s what your immune system is constantly doing, it degrades everything and creates immunity.

For you to be able to identify a specific DNA/RNA strand in PCR, it has to be a huge amount of it floating around your bloodstream, and it must be released faster than your immune system can degrade it. And it has to be so many copies of that RNA/DNA that you can even detect it in other samples that aren’t blood (like the nose swab).

That only happens if you have a viral pathogen actively replicating and releasing millions of DNA/RNA copies per second (aka an active viral infection).

So this is why you don’t test positive for covid PCR after you take the vaccine (because your immune system took care of it all and the copies just aren’t enough to show up on the PCR). And that is why you don’t test positive for viral PCR right after you had contact with someone with a viral infection - you don’t have enough viral RNA/DNA in your sample, because the virus hasn’t made millions and millions of copies (yet, maybe after a couple of hours you will test positive).

You just don’t happen to have just enough covid DNA/RNA in your nose to test positive in PCR, that is not how it works (your immune system would not just ignore that and let it float around). False positive results can happen of course (nothing is set in stone). But in this setting, speccially with PCR technique, there’s almost 0 chance that happens. So much so the most common errors with PCR are the false negatives, not the false positives.

PCR is the most reliable and accurate test we have for viral infections.

ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 1y ago 💬 1

the discoverer of the technique strongly disagrees with your thesis, i recommend you read what he says

each type of viral infection has specific metabolic markers, and the only reliable virus infection detection method at minimum requires blood samples, some more than others

i am not talking out of my hat here, until this PCR/mRNA "vax" bullshit started i had on several occasions had full pathology tests of viruses and they had to take about 10ml of my blood to do it

you can't find viruses without a blood sample, or, if the virus does not travel in blood, a biopsy of the tissue it infects

it is true that viruses can travel through mucus and other fluids such as from sinus, genital, and other excreted fluids (including mixed in with excreta and urine and in tears, saliva, such as the nasal and oral secretions that are used for this "covid" test, but the number of particles required to impart an infection is so small that the chances of detecting anything in these locations is near enough to zero, in real world, actual situation

the PCR tests are NOT meant for virus detection, they are meant for DNA detection, and that's the main use, and will always be the main use, in criminal forensic pathology

there is even, for years now, special alarm systems that emit a spray containing a distinctive DNA sequence, that can be used as part of evidence to locate a person as having been physically in a place with such an alarm system, and the PCR test is required to determine if they were exposed to this distinctive sequence of DNA

but when you are walking around and the spit and slobber and nasal mucus of people is floating around in teh air, on the doorknobs, and seats and touchscreens and buttons of ATMs, you can have this virus on you in such a way as that one particle gets in your nose, which can't infect you, and then you go to a PCR testing thing to get a swab and oh, we found a particle of covid on you

NO SHIT IT"S EVERYWHERE

doesn't mean anything, is an utterly utterly useless form of diagnostic, at best you could use one to say "maybe if this tests positive and they seem sick we should do a blood test"

it's NOT a useful diagnostic alone

the entire scheme of this protocol with covid was a complete sham, total fuckery and quackery and propaganda

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

PatriciaABSantos 1y ago 💬 1

The blood samples are used for serology tests, where you find antibodies against viruses. It is also very useful, but your imune system takes time to create those antibodies (up to 4 weeks). Using PCR to detect active viral infection (before you can detect antibodies) is faster, easier and cheaper. If you had a symptomatic person with covid and did serology tests, you would find antibodies in the bloodstream. However, since covid spreads before the symptoms start, if you waited 4+ weeks to diagnose an individual and isolate it from the comunity, it would be a waste of time since that person spent the whole excretion time walking around and spreading covid. So they used PCR instead.

ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 1y ago 💬 2

exactly

using PCR on a fast spreading virus is literally useless

ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 1y ago 💬 1

the whole thing was a fraud, i am wondering why i followed you when you clearly don't see this

PatriciaABSantos 1y ago 💬 1

Well I think hearing different points of view and arguments can be quiet healthy, so thanks for the chat :)

ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 1y ago

i think that if you are so interested in this subject at this point and you never heard what i said before, you are actually lying

PatriciaABSantos 1y ago 💬 1

But if you detect it in time you can isolate the carrier and stop the spreading! Reducing the spreading is better than doing nothing because there are individuals who are more fragile and could really suffer from the disease

ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 1y ago

yeah, a bit like jailing everyone who was within 1km of a murder, when you aren't even certain that the perp has had the time to get outside of that boundary

it's not effective to be excessively punitive on people over a FUCKNIG COLD VIRUS

don't waste your time trying to explain why i am wrong because i literally spent 3 days in the typical covid anaphylaxis, i beat that virus and i have barely been as sick as this since, and before, it was the same as ever, something that happens every 5 years or so, big FUCKING DEAL

fuck off with your praise of PCR and lockdowns, you are literally retarded