Thank you for sharing this. I read it all!

Are there any things that you thought would be important that are not, and vice verse? I’m making this decision now with someone Is why I’m so curious

Why are you measuring your wealth in shitcoins? 🤔

> Bitcoin people, you may have little idea how odd that feels, landing in a social network populated by laser-eyed people and not knowing why.

Let me know if it works as this sounds like a huge scam 😂

Just walk everyday wherever you want.

Writing a sci fi manuscript, and continuing to fine tune it, made me do a ton of extra research on current trends in AI, biotech, material science, and VR. Like a big refresh.

Not because the text focuses in detail on this tech (it doesn’t), but rather so that I have a general idea of what technologies are likely to come before or after other ones, to create what seems (at least to me) a reasonably coherent future world (with one big unrealistic extra thing I threw in there for fun).

There are a lot of different path dependencies or “alternate timelines” for how the world could look in say 2030, 2040, 2050, and so on. So no sci fi vision can be said to fully predict things. And for example, we don’t fault the movie Blade Runner for not accurately predicting what 2019 would be like in 1982.

But my goal is to be “well-considered.” Plausible. Or at least, plausible in the places where I am intending to be the most plausible.

For example if I read a space opera set 500 years in the future and AI is nowhere to be found, or minimally so, I am distracted by this unless given a plausible explanation. The explanation of “the author didn’t think about it” isn’t good enough, at least for something that big.

What technologies do you expect to surprise to the upside or downside in the next few decades?

Robinhood Experiment: repost this and get 21 sats. Any zaps this post receives will also be redistributed to all who repost. Please zap and be part of this charity event. 24 hours only, go! 🎯

the whole thing was a fraud, i am wondering why i followed you when you clearly don't see this

exactly

using PCR on a fast spreading virus is literally useless

Hands down the dumbest take on #Bitcoin and real estate in 2024, no joke.

the discoverer of the technique strongly disagrees with your thesis, i recommend you read what he says

each type of viral infection has specific metabolic markers, and the only reliable virus infection detection method at minimum requires blood samples, some more than others

i am not talking out of my hat here, until this PCR/mRNA "vax" bullshit started i had on several occasions had full pathology tests of viruses and they had to take about 10ml of my blood to do it

you can't find viruses without a blood sample, or, if the virus does not travel in blood, a biopsy of the tissue it infects

it is true that viruses can travel through mucus and other fluids such as from sinus, genital, and other excreted fluids (including mixed in with excreta and urine and in tears, saliva, such as the nasal and oral secretions that are used for this "covid" test, but the number of particles required to impart an infection is so small that the chances of detecting anything in these locations is near enough to zero, in real world, actual situation

the PCR tests are NOT meant for virus detection, they are meant for DNA detection, and that's the main use, and will always be the main use, in criminal forensic pathology

there is even, for years now, special alarm systems that emit a spray containing a distinctive DNA sequence, that can be used as part of evidence to locate a person as having been physically in a place with such an alarm system, and the PCR test is required to determine if they were exposed to this distinctive sequence of DNA

but when you are walking around and the spit and slobber and nasal mucus of people is floating around in teh air, on the doorknobs, and seats and touchscreens and buttons of ATMs, you can have this virus on you in such a way as that one particle gets in your nose, which can't infect you, and then you go to a PCR testing thing to get a swab and oh, we found a particle of covid on you

NO SHIT IT"S EVERYWHERE

doesn't mean anything, is an utterly utterly useless form of diagnostic, at best you could use one to say "maybe if this tests positive and they seem sick we should do a blood test"

it's NOT a useful diagnostic alone

the entire scheme of this protocol with covid was a complete sham, total fuckery and quackery and propaganda

did you watch the video i linked? the inventor himself says that the test doesn’t tell you if you’re sick or if the infection you ended up with is actually going to hurt you. quite shocked i can still find this on youtube