guys i broke the chain of custody on 2008.jpeg #[0] #[1]
see:
#[2]
Discussion
thinking the best we can get to is
1. current block’s hash to prove the message was constructed no sooner than the block
2. open time stamp to prove the message was constructed no later than the timestamp
ie, even if i mess with the “created_at”,
if my note includes the hash of block 778312, you know my note was written at some point after that block.
if my note also includes an opentimestamp, you know my note was written before that timestamp.
still has the limitation that i may create a note with the above and not broadcast it until later so may need a better chain anchor.
#[4] any additional thoughts on how we can move “assets” on nostr that are cheat-proof.
i had read your nostr2.0 but weekly merkle trees still have a gap that can be chated, even when supplemented with the timestamps above.
Taro bundles off-chain assets into 1 on-chain Merkle root.
Nostr may enhance Taro by allowing you to distribute full copies of assets to as many nostr nodes as possible without putting the full assets on-chain.
How dare you open this two-month-old thread, #[3]
Like you said, Nostr is not a timechain.
Nostr should not be relied on for immutability like a strong Nakamoto consensus blockchain is. Nostr is better suited to paying for off-chain data replication across as many computers as possible, on a gradual timeline with daily/weekly zaps to the nostr nodes hosting the data.⚡️
The synergy comes from them working together, like the other off-chain layers do.