Think the problem is too many people (white and non-white) are falling for the leftist racist paradigm in which foreigners, some of whom are not suited to open western societies, are admitted out of pity or guilt. Pity for a group is also racism. When instead prospective immigrants should be vetted carefully, on the individual merits, and to the extent there are not enough resources to do so, then we should just have less immigration until that changes.
The solution then isn’t to perpetuate collectivism and just change the group designation from “in need” to “dangerous.” The solution IMO is to dismantle the group identification altogether and stop importing people who can’t demonstrate they belong on the merits.
Agree it’s a psyop to convince people that ANY culture, no matter how backward, is as desirable as ours on American soil, but getting people to view each other through the prism of categories like race, religion, country of origin is also a divide and conquer psyop. The biggest nightmare for government is for people of uncommon ancestry to make common cause. Because if that happened, they’d have no choice but to respond to the people rather than their oligarch clients. They bring in foreigners who have no business being here precisely to destabilize and divide IMO. They want you to ID as white, to see others as your adversaries.
So while it’s tempting to say, “no more of these people from country X” it doesn’t get to the root cause of the problem which is collectivism. The more you try to push out people of Country X, the more sympathy will build for them. Eventually you’ll have “free country x” protests in the streets, on college campuses, worldwide. The more you fight on their turf (identity politics) the more it will be used against you, and you opened the door to it.
Only good solution is to tell people who want to frame you with “white guilt” or “white privilege” to fuck off, not because you are proud or not proud of your race, but because your race is irrelevant to your individual moral standing.
