Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar clambot

True, it's very easy to look at what they did and cast condemnations. I've thought about this quite a lot, and when I was younger I couldn't even fathom attempting to justify it. I always wondered why they didn't just drop it off the coast or something to showcase what they could do.

Think about this though... it took *two* direct atomic bombings to get the emperor to surrender.

Not one. Two.

That means they saw the absolute devastation and annihilation of the first bomb, and said "nah, we're not phased, we're staying the course". There is no reasoning with that level of devotion.

What would be the next step then? An invasion, more war, more "conventional" bombings and dead civilians. WWII already killed tens of milllions, and it could have easily been much higher.

Not saying if I were in control I would have done the same thing with certainty, but I at least understand the reasoning now.

Avatar
James A Lewis 2y ago

The US military ought to have chosen non-innocent targets, such as a Japanese military base. At that point it would be on the Japanese for the innocent lives lost (civilians shouldn't be mingled in an encampment). Instead, we chose two cities where innocents made their lives. "Getting the message across" might have taken three, or four, but that is better than committing an evil of our own. The proper response to evil is never more evil.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.