Replying to Avatar Ava

Good Lord I need a nap after fact checking and writing this response. Lol

Monero doesn't have a fixed cap. It has tail emission. 0.6 XMR per block, started May 2022. Creates about 1% inflation initially and trends toward zero over time. Keeps miners incentivized long-term without relying on fees alone.

Supply is predictable. We know exactly how many coins exist: roughly 18.44 million XMR plus 0.6 XMR every 2 minutes. Accounting for lost coins, probably deflationary in practice. That's scarcity.

On 51% attack resistance—yeah, attacks were attempted recently. August 2025 saw a 6-block reorg. September brought an 18-block reorg, the deepest in Monero's history. The selfish-mining attack peaked around 33% hashrate, not majority control. No double-spends executed, no funds stolen, but 118 transactions rolled back. Real stress test.

Monero's response was immediate. FCMP++ development accelerated. An alpha stressnet launched October 3, 2025.

FCMP++ moves from ring signatures with a ring size of 16 (15 decoys + 1 real) to full-chain membership proofs. Instead of proving your transaction came from one of 16 possible outputs, it proves it came from one of millions across the entire chain. Makes tracing effectively impossible.

Optimization competitions ran. 100 XMR bounty for helioselene, 250 XMR for ec-divisors. They achieved a 5x speedup in proof generation. Beta stressnet targeted Q1 2026.

Consensus hardening happened at the same time. "Share or Perish" fork-choice proposals are under active development. They’re designed to penalize delayed block broadcasts and kill the profitability of selfish mining. Additional finality layers and merge-mining concepts are being explored.

December 2025 status: hashrate at 6.74 GH/s, network stabilized, 17 active FCMP++ implementation issues with 4 closed, XMR up 94% year-over-year despite the attacks, privacy cryptography intact. Zero protocol compromises.

The network got tested. It responded with technical fixes, transparent crisis management, and fast timelines.

If you need untraceable transactions at scale—nothing else does what Monero does.

There is no competition.

​BTC 🍏

XMR 🍐

​Bitcoin is the new digital element. The discovery of digital scarcity. Monero is a technology that acts as a Privacy Sidechain for BTC on demand. Through Atomic Swaps, you store wealth in BTC and use XMR as a private rail.

​But technology evolves.

​Newer solutions like E-Cash (Cashu/Nuts) or Lightning Privacy (Bolt12) offer better UX and native Bitcoin integration. E-Cash even enables offline trade, which a blockchain like XMR cannot do.

#​FreedomTech will change constantly. 💜

The base asset #Bitcoin remains forever. 🧡

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

This makes sense.

> monero doesn’t need a layer 2

I am going to assume you mean this only in the context of privacy? The only reason monero and many other L1s can claim to “not need a layer 2” is because they haven’t had to scale and decide about the trade off between size and throughput. As far as I know monero doesn’t solve this and so it would eventually need an L2 anyway

this is true.

monero txs are larger than Bitcoin and if it started doing 5-10x the tx it would need a L2.

payment channels are a possibility.

Gonna start calling you Professor Hanshan the way you out here educating 🫡

ill go back to starting fights soon ❤

🤣 I appreciate both sides lol

Yes, I meant that in the context of privacy. Monero has protocol-level privacy.

Assuming ecash delivers it's privacy promises, I'd rather use it like a small cash wallet than deal with Monero. Monero was an absolute miserable pain in the ass to actually use back when I gave it a go. It took me a very short time to realize it probably wouldn't end up being meaningfully adopted. At this point, I feel better off just using the various Bitcoin tools. Youre never going to fit it all into a single layer. Maybe things have improved UX wise, but it would have to be a massive improvement for me to deal with it again. I'm curious how many people are actually using it like I am Bitcoin today. I see all the puritanical arguing on here, but I mean actually using products where you can have your fiat check land as Bitcoin and spend it using on chain, Lightning, or ecash. Or using something like Bill pay from Strike, gift cards bought with sats, etc for fiat bills. How big is that ecosystem in comparison now?

And I'm very unlikely to store any meaningful amount of wealth in Monero so I'm still just swapping in and out of something else anyway. I'm not sold on it. The UX lost me to Bitcoin. The ecosystem wasn't nearly as good, in my opinion. It feels like a dead topic to me. I'm much happier just using something Bitcoin related to maintain consistency in UX.

Dead topic meaning I haven't seen any improvement or argument that changes my mind.

what was the pain point about monero UX?

there isn't anything wrong with LN privacy really.

its not worth anybody's effort and nobody is looking.

Its super confusng when you call back on old threads...i end up commenting on something from a year ago 😂

Not really your fault..maybe more amethyst's layout

how are those bolt12 invoices working for you? because I've never been able to successfully use bolt12.

but I really hope one day LN lives up to its billing.

Ecash isnt Bitcoin.

so no.

it doesn't make sense.

You can could just run an ecash mint that accepts xmr…