That would be a very valid and self-evident category.
Applying the label to anything that isn't Bitcoin and especially to what is arguably the best tool for anonymous and private financial transactions in existence, isn't.
I really don't get people who think the way you do. Bitcoin and #monero are software, it's not a football club.
I rarely actually use Bitcoin (onchain), but I save in Bitcoin. It's great for that, Monero not so much.
I use Lightning day-to-day a lot, but Lightning is a hot wallet (not just mine, the whole network). I would not be comfortable having more than a few thousand $ worth of sats in there at any time.
I don't save much on Monero (but more than Lightning), and while thr UX/UI is not as polished, in terms of low friction and anonymity/privacy guarantees, Bitcoin doesn't match it today.
It would be great if Bitcoin could do all of it, but privacy and anonymity today onchain are a chore, and it will also flag any coins you tried to anonymize in a very public way.
In short, it's not either-or, it's not black and white, and it's not so simple as "not bitcoin? shitcoin!"
I'm sorry, but respectfully, that's rather stupid and ignorant. No offense.
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=728x552&blurhash=%236DItJ00O9n40MIV-pS%7EkB0001.ma0j%5B%3D%7BnNxtM%7B.m%3DeIAt7-oIVIpS5S500-p%5E%2B57xaXSnNjFw%5Et9X8D%25o%7Dr%3FbFs%3AxaWXxZnO%25fi_t7oMIoR*jZnjV%40ShWBR*s%3AWUsoxZ&x=083591f9fa04e859b1913307aa329c8edda46ccef8f427ef2c3dfeb9c0ea7ae3