Dude is a classic "my one experiment allegedly doesn't fit and that proves your 100+ agreeing experiments are all wrong rather than proving I've made a mistake or misunderstood my 1 experiment"

By all means, science moves forward because we keep poking at the things that don't quite make sense given what we think we know.

The issue is that to disprove all of the standing science you need to FULLY prove that there is no other explanation you missed for your result not fitting and show the mistakes in the 100 other experiments each using unique methodologies that all agreed.

Reversed stupidity is not intelligence. Most people can't explain gravity, pointing that out doesn't mean I can fly.

TLDR, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. A YouTube video about a single experiment by an amateur does not constitute extraordinary evidence.