Nostr Web Client

I've put more work into these 3 podcast episodes than the last 50 combined.

This rabbit hole is personal for me.

If you've ever enjoyed my podcast in the past, I hope that no matter how much you think I've "gone crazy", you do me the courtesy of having a listen with an open mind, and giving it a fair shake.

I've put a lot of blood sweat & tears into it because I honestly believe that those who start from the beginning and watch it all the way through will go through a profound shift in how they view the biggest question of all: WHERE ARE WE?

Bookmark them. They may just change your life.

Youtube:

https://youtu.be/1bj7QHby69s

https://youtu.be/TSWx8e74r0g

https://youtu.be/hQ3ZXsvTLyg

Rumble:

https://rumble.com/v6wuo24-nasa-lied-to-us-about-everything-bwp139.html

https://rumble.com/v6xgzk0-introduction-to-flat-earth-w-flat-earth-dave-part-12.html

https://rumble.com/v6xh94g-introduction-to-flat-earth-w-flat-earth-dave-part-22.html

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

dvo 4mo ago

these have been great. really didn’t consider any of this before it

Stacking Functions 4mo ago

Nice to find some good open minded people to follow in the comments here

John 4mo ago

Incredible work, thank you!

₿en Wehrman 4mo ago 💬 3

One of the flat earth arguments I did not (and probably will not) have time to dive into in my video series on the subject is FLIGHT PATHS.

I recommend anyone who's taken long international flights with weird layovers in different countries recently look into this themselves to see what they find.

Ex) For my trip from USA to Australia, I had a layover in China, which makes little sense on a globe map, but perfect sense on a FE map.

https://blossom.primal.net/d73dc1c256f38a61475687f9382004858d8d57afe06dd3bcdb0ce7d0ed2a61d8.mp4

nostr:nevent1qqsr32ccsrxzc6wlrke2avxgt6r56x44qjs5pxrweck0y85v327tyycpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5hsygqqrzm7uvlmy5uyxcuuvt3f9lk8qznf4yas3m3hf3da49cunvu4vspsgqqqqqqsgy75wc

Achilles 4mo ago

I‘ll watch it 🫡💜

Rush 4mo ago

Read about geodesic paths.. They're wierd, yes, but it makes sense then you go from one side of the world to another..

BlackBlot 4mo ago 💬 1

I have watched ep 1 + 2 so far. Im intriged - do you know how satellites are supposed to work with "flat earth"? Obviously cant use google to find out since they will peddle mumbo jumbo. I image satellites "orbit" around the north pole or something. But do you know ?

₿en Wehrman 4mo ago

Didn't have time to get into that - I know lots of FE channels have videos about it, try searching "flat earth satellites" on rumble/bitchute/odysee

Dave probably has some vids on his website too!

John 4mo ago

NASA is the world's largest buyer of helium... So there's that.

"Space Industry - NASA is the single biggest buyer of helium globally, consuming approximately 75 million cubic feet of helium annually, primarily used in rocket propulsion."

Do some research of just how many satellites hit the ground with white translucent balloons attached to them...

BlackBlot 4mo ago

Starlink satelittes look like they go much faster than balloons?

John 4mo ago

True, they do look that way based on what we've been shown. Do we trust what we've been shown? Can we actually verify what we've seen? Can there be other explanations? We still have much discovery to do, and I don't have answers for everything, but there sure are trends unfolding that would suggest things are nothing like what we've been told.

BlackBlot 4mo ago

Agree - but starlink sats can be seen moving accross the sky with a telescope. Definately not balloons. I dont think the flat earth stuff is 100% correct and there are still some iffy explanations - but the official narrative is definately not correct. Bens series so far convinced me of that.

John 4mo ago

Please send any videos of the starlink sats, I saw some time ago a video of the trail of the starlink SATs moving at night, when some were complaining they were too bright... It was puzzling, and I'm not sure what it is. Was it another type of technology within the atmosphere? Something else? We should all dig in and keep looking.

In general though we need to be careful to weigh all things evenly without bias. For example, many people will require you to disprove something they believe 100% before changing their mind, and force you to prove something they don't believe 100%. When in reality things we currently think are true, should be weighed evenly with things we never contemplated as true. Especially in this world of lies.

Give all models a fair and unbias analysis with a critical eye. There will always be unanswered questions, but those are independent from other evidence in the sense they have a cumulative effect, not a negating effect.

And lastly, we shouldn't "believe" anything. Know, or don't know, either is fine. Belief is just outsourcing critical thinking.

So with all that said, I agree, the starlink sats are curious and I don't know what is happening there. For me that has very little effect on the overall paradigm analysis and other evidence, but I'd like to know.

BlackBlot 4mo ago

I mean the starlinks are there no matter if they are balloons or not. Just so many people working on the starlink satellites - and then be conned by someone who sends up a balloon instead. Same can be said about geostationary satellites

John 4mo ago

Same can be said for NASA...