I have watched ep 1 + 2 so far. Im intriged - do you know how satellites are supposed to work with "flat earth"? Obviously cant use google to find out since they will peddle mumbo jumbo. I image satellites "orbit" around the north pole or something. But do you know ?
I've put more work into these 3 podcast episodes than the last 50 combined.
This rabbit hole is personal for me.
If you've ever enjoyed my podcast in the past, I hope that no matter how much you think I've "gone crazy", you do me the courtesy of having a listen with an open mind, and giving it a fair shake.
I've put a lot of blood sweat & tears into it because I honestly believe that those who start from the beginning and watch it all the way through will go through a profound shift in how they view the biggest question of all: WHERE ARE WE?
Bookmark them. They may just change your life.
Youtube:
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/v6wuo24-nasa-lied-to-us-about-everything-bwp139.html
https://rumble.com/v6xgzk0-introduction-to-flat-earth-w-flat-earth-dave-part-12.html
https://rumble.com/v6xh94g-introduction-to-flat-earth-w-flat-earth-dave-part-22.html
Discussion
Didn't have time to get into that - I know lots of FE channels have videos about it, try searching "flat earth satellites" on rumble/bitchute/odysee
Dave probably has some vids on his website too!
NASA is the world's largest buyer of helium... So there's that.
"Space Industry - NASA is the single biggest buyer of helium globally, consuming approximately 75 million cubic feet of helium annually, primarily used in rocket propulsion."
Do some research of just how many satellites hit the ground with white translucent balloons attached to them...
Starlink satelittes look like they go much faster than balloons?
True, they do look that way based on what we've been shown. Do we trust what we've been shown? Can we actually verify what we've seen? Can there be other explanations? We still have much discovery to do, and I don't have answers for everything, but there sure are trends unfolding that would suggest things are nothing like what we've been told.
Agree - but starlink sats can be seen moving accross the sky with a telescope. Definately not balloons. I dont think the flat earth stuff is 100% correct and there are still some iffy explanations - but the official narrative is definately not correct. Bens series so far convinced me of that.
Please send any videos of the starlink sats, I saw some time ago a video of the trail of the starlink SATs moving at night, when some were complaining they were too bright... It was puzzling, and I'm not sure what it is. Was it another type of technology within the atmosphere? Something else? We should all dig in and keep looking.
In general though we need to be careful to weigh all things evenly without bias. For example, many people will require you to disprove something they believe 100% before changing their mind, and force you to prove something they don't believe 100%. When in reality things we currently think are true, should be weighed evenly with things we never contemplated as true. Especially in this world of lies.
Give all models a fair and unbias analysis with a critical eye. There will always be unanswered questions, but those are independent from other evidence in the sense they have a cumulative effect, not a negating effect.
And lastly, we shouldn't "believe" anything. Know, or don't know, either is fine. Belief is just outsourcing critical thinking.
So with all that said, I agree, the starlink sats are curious and I don't know what is happening there. For me that has very little effect on the overall paradigm analysis and other evidence, but I'd like to know.