As a fellow engineer, is this how you operate as a CTO? You cannot accept that your well founded engineering decision may be wrong?
Just curious, is there any dissenting opinion around you, or is it silenced, or simply ignored?
As a fellow engineer, is this how you operate as a CTO? You cannot accept that your well founded engineering decision may be wrong?
Just curious, is there any dissenting opinion around you, or is it silenced, or simply ignored?
You're viewing a prime example of how engineering discussions work.
Someone makes a proposal, which then gets peer reviewed in an attempt to poke holes in it.
So your dismissive additude of others opinions is just a byproduct of your personality and not a reaction to the merit of the argument.
It requires a fair amount of ignorance to think functionality can be removed from Bitcoin without consequence. You wouldn't see such a suggestion coming from a protocol developer.
The immediate increase in attack surface for no meaningful reason is very, very reckless.
He gets lots of dissenting feedback on nostr at least. The majority seems to be dissent. I think he has a sadism streak to be honest. The glee and the taunting is excruciatingly unserious.
Oh, it's quite serious.
I seriously enjoy being proven correct regarding controversial opinions.
Humility.... he's heard of it 🤣
I heard a guy saying you should stay humble and stack sats, but I stopped stacking sats long ago.
So you got yours. Got it.
At least this is starting to make sense.
No need to be humble anymore