So justice is the rape and murder of the criminal?
Discussion
Justice is the alleged criminal getting a fair hearing in a court of law under the presumption of being innocent untill proven guilty, by an impartial judge, prosecuted by the victim in the case of rape or those related to the victim in the case of murder.
If proven guilty, it is up to prosecutor to seek the restitution that is just for them and the judge to decide if said restitution is indeed just according to criminal law.
The correct act of punitive measure accompanied by the right procedure in determining guilt or innocence is what justice entails.
If somebody does that to any person I love, the only justice for me is if I'm able to exact the worst kind of vengeance I can imagine, and then imagine worse and repeat.
This is justice. All the words you said are bullshit. Which is why ANCAP is bullshit.
I understand where you're coming from. That would be how I feel too if I know conclusively with evidence that the accused person is guilty. It's a sensitive hypothetical situation.
But it wouldn't be ideal for society if everyone acts on everything solely based on their emotions. It would be chaos and barbarism.
That's why we establish a set of morals, laws and ethics that is common to all, to avoid such hypotheticals, to create a social order that protects people's natural rights, and establish ways to deal with those who violate them.
Societies incentives are rarely my own. Which is why this is fake volunteerism. Absolute bullshit if you ask me.
I see that your main problem is with people calling it 'voluntaryism'.
It is voluntary only to the extent that your incentives and the actions you make in accordance with them don't violate the rights of others.