The "nutrient density" of any salt is negligible. It's all marketing. Focus on taste.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Spitting fire bombs. Nice. 👍

You don’t think the source of where something comes from influences the mineral content of it? I.e mineral poor land grows mineral poor food?

🧐

Sure, on a minute scale, but the only thing those can provide in any *meaningful* amount is sodium and chloride.

Is the only meaningful compound in tap water, water? Or the minute amount of fluoride in it? Some trace elements don’t require much. I get your point but I tend to think consumption of anything at the margin can yield grander effects over the long term.

That’s a big brain comment.

Think:

1) Look at the volume of water you consume in a day vs the volume of salt

2) There are no minerals in any salts that have such a minute daily requirement that you can reach that requirement by using a small amount of salt. You WILL meet those requirements, and then some, with proper food intake

Salt is seasoning, nothing more. Trying to decide on a salt to use based off of its alleged mineral content is a waste of time, energy, and possibly money.

I’m not saying I disagree with you in principle. Margins at best and 99% of people don’t need to concern themselves with minutia. But I will choose the best salt. To be the most healthiest.

Net net. We all agree 👍

For the win 🥇

A little iodine in salt goes a long way 😅

There's a lot of conflicting evidence regarding iodine.

No , there isn’t.

Pink has iodine. For the win 🏆