Having less than 1btc does fuck you, because at least with purchasing power denominated in fiat, you're at a fraction of 1. So as the value of one doubles, you get a fraction of a double.
All the more reason to get 1 whole btc. It isn't linear, it's exponential.
This 1 btc = 100 mil sats business is silly. We should just use sats for thinking. I guess that'll be easier to get people to do after a sat is worth more than a dollar
Centi Sats. I'm not sure what they would be called
Cent sat parity is coming. Could easily hit next cycle...
Now that you say that, perhaps centisat is short sighted and it should be milliSats.
I mean decasats
Brain hurts.
1 cuckbuck = 1 kilosat
no pain, no gain
That one is easy. That's just what it is now
He's got an HSat
Just trying to hear the sound of it. Interesting how things get named. Do the names precede the thing or thing precede the name.
Depends on your standpoint. If profane, the thing arises before the name. That is, the mind bound by the phenomenological names (< verb) to define constraints. But if seeing with the single eye, the world of phenomena flows nondiscreetly, so the thing follows the name.
But to come down from my floaty cloud of woo woo... I farted. I like to think sats will always be the lowest denomination, so when we get to soft forking more zeroes, what we call sats now will be dimes or something.
I'm going with DSats as a replacement for the word "dollar".
CSats
Dsats
KSats,
MSats,
you can already do that with lightning, tho most clients don't expose that feature of the protocol
1 cuckbuck = 1 kilosat
