Nostr Web Client

I don't know if they have each other as peers. I do know that at least two pools have complained that ignoring the subsat tx filters caused them to lose money via an increased orphan rate. CKPool complained about this here: https://x.com/ckpooldev/status/1957235824451559746 and Mara Pool complained about it here: https://x.com/PortlandHODL/status/1958520763083825640

So if they *are* peering with one another it is apparently insufficient. The miners who *ignore* that peering (maybe Ocean?) and just broadcast blocks to the rest of the network benefitted by getting their blocks propagated faster, and winning more races. I want to see that play out again, but this time with inscriptions, and to that end I am excited to see the Knots count rise.

Akashi Hyogo 3mo ago

Wow, I get it! But the difference has to be miniscule.

The thing is, additional revenue from sub sat txs is 0.06% which is super low. So that's why.

Also the orpahend block chance increases only because some miners are accepting them and some not.

This does not really apply to OP_RETURN debate. Or? Is there sb else beside Ocean?

What is a chance currently, that there are 2 new competing blocks - one by core and one by knots mimer AND next block by knots miner building on the competing knots block?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.