If I only have a link via the bitsatrelay satellite then it must be able to know I'm communicating with it directly, or if not, having an @ tag in the message to indicate that re-relaying it is requested.
It's cool tech but having over half my notifications be unrequested bitsatrelay events is ott.
This is what it looks like: 
but what you saying can just be done on the client.. just disable the wss relay.. on my iris client i just slide the tab over and disable the wss for the satellite.. then just a click and next message goes out via the sat as well... if you dont send your message to the sat relay it wont relay .... i dont understand why we suggesting to clip the systems wings when the user can just not use it ...
or am i missing something ? is the other sides replies and quotes that tag you the annoying part ? again if so how do you suggest we approach this architecture.. because soon we want to add a 3 layer with lora mesh messages... somehow the internet connected users will have 3 ways... mesh message received... sat message received.. etc... again.. the goal of this system is to distribute connectivity optins... we ought to have a spaces / tech hall to discuss / brainstorm this. nostr:npub1c03rad0r6q833vh57kyd3ndu2jry30nkr0wepqfpsm05vq7he25slryrnw .. your thoughts ?
Yeah it's the mirroring of all my activity that's not necessary, I showed my notifications above in the screenshot, it's just copies of messages or copies of boosts etc.
It's not on my relay list, I only ever used it via cli in order to send directly to it.
Currently I can't stop it unless I block it, which is why it feels spammy.
I think the issue is your end buddy ... you are still sending your Kind 1 messages via the satellite relay .. here is the log from the system.. you can see the last one a few min ago..
Could be outbox model? I started looking into this, but didn't come to any conclusions.
It's not listed on my relays in Amethyst so I don't know how I'm doing that.
It also reposts message I boost, which I don't think is kind 1? Might be wrong there. Either way I haven't added it as a relay on this client.
Might be what nostr:npub1cn670f663n3ks02jnnlsvd5y88zjnefy8343ykaxs7y3nzzketrsrjwt8a suggests.
Ah, it reposts my repost, so that is a kind 1.
🛰️Off-Grid Relayed via satellite🛰️
--------------------------------
↩️ REPLY to nostr:npub19at4nqjjymca2lh3v546vcg5ktun3al4c5xu2pts3ewckv0y70ys0gupzr
Re: nostr:note1889q7fswtd6lthnjj8ak8wprrgqwy77wed3kuyrtj6jahnltvjsqt79pcg
nostr:npub18cel6ufy7960c5632xfhlpccvdxankzkzs75ema45yxa4uhkzhqqsrulqe said:
but what you saying can just be done on the client.. just disable the wss relay.. on my iris client i just slide the tab over and disable the wss for the satellite.. then just a click and next message goes out via the sat as well... if you dont send your message to the sat relay it wont relay .... i dont understand why we suggesting to clip the systems wings when the user can just not use it ...
or am i missing something ? is the other sides replies and quotes that tag you the annoying part ? again if so how do you suggest we approach this architecture.. because soon we want to add a 3 layer with lora mesh messages... somehow the internet connected users will have 3 ways... mesh message received... sat message received.. etc... again.. the goal of this system is to distribute connectivity optins... we ought to have a spaces / tech hall to discuss / brainstorm this. nostr:npub1c03rad0r6q833vh57kyd3ndu2jry30nkr0wepqfpsm05vq7he25slryrnw .. your thoughts ?
--------------------------------
📡 BitSatRelay - Terminal-HQ
