Hue gotta put bitcoin there first 😂

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

What if I randomly say 12 words on the BIP 39 list and they happen to have sats on them? By definition that would be a transfer of assets if the ownership is defined by who owns those words.

This seems like a slippery slope where words now have real world value and where a government is going after people that are transferring words and 1s and 0s to each other instead of playing in their corrupt system of lies

The slippery slope being a 1 in 5.44 x 10^18th power chance of randomly guessing someone’s seed?

Don’t get me wrong, fuck the IRS. But that’s a bad example.

I meant more that words having value associated with them now we are being limited in speech by our government. I think the transfer of any set of keys random or not is freedom of speech

I think your argument is against taxes, not against limits on speech.

Receiving any sort of non employment income in the amount of $600 or more requires a 1099. It’s not bitcoin specific.