What if I randomly say 12 words on the BIP 39 list and they happen to have sats on them? By definition that would be a transfer of assets if the ownership is defined by who owns those words.

This seems like a slippery slope where words now have real world value and where a government is going after people that are transferring words and 1s and 0s to each other instead of playing in their corrupt system of lies

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The slippery slope being a 1 in 5.44 x 10^18th power chance of randomly guessing someone’s seed?

Don’t get me wrong, fuck the IRS. But that’s a bad example.

I meant more that words having value associated with them now we are being limited in speech by our government. I think the transfer of any set of keys random or not is freedom of speech

I think your argument is against taxes, not against limits on speech.

Receiving any sort of non employment income in the amount of $600 or more requires a 1099. It’s not bitcoin specific.