“I don’t trust science communicators, as they can have agendas …”

Let’s continue this line of inquiry—where does the scientific method come from? Athens. Who invented it? Socrates. What is it? Asking questions.

Your implicit agenda is to make the case that we don’t need to keep asking questions because some of the science is settled. Is science ever settled or is settled science just agenda setting or propaganda? Sure some data trees may be more persuasive than others but curiosity has to remain our default state.

Curiosity has to remain our default state because we understand that there is no intrinsic or ontological value without the observer’s say so.

Or you believe in God as the prime mover and you stop pretending you don’t know, stop pretending you value learning.

You are right that Bitcoin is the most objective truth record in the history of man but that truth, or science, is also based on common agreement or consensus.

So science will always be a question and not a statement no matter how advanced our knowledge and technology because, I suppose, there is no pure and perfect recursive action at a distance.

Only if causality itself is shown to be its own effect via Quantum shit will we have to rethink our bias toward asking questions rather than assuming. Stay curious, my friend.