That description fits HydraVeil, but we require the user to have Linux. Telling people they have privacy on Brave with Windows is a lie
Discussion
Yes, privacy in Windows is a lie.
Brave on Linux isn't.
Tell people to use Linux... there aren't many.
I've seen you promote Monero, although some argue Bitcoin Lightning is private enough.
I've seen you promote Session, although some argue Signal is private enough.
When is something private? Where do we draw the line?
I personally draw the line at when something is significantly better, but offers no downside or has no technical difficulty compared to the original. And it is through doing this upgrades without harm, that society evolves.
So Brave Browser by default even on Linux very clearly gives a huge number of fingerprint identifiers, and the vast number of people will be unable to configure the complex settings. While as HydraVeil is EASIER than Brave's settings to configure, it's just pushing a button on a GUI.
Now can you ignore my article and type a few sentences like "No it's not" just to avoid reading? Yeah, but then you gotta ask yourself why you're spending time to be a tech influencer that doesn't want to help people grow.
I have had a idea about decentralized internet for a long time. Dont have coding ability but i do have the concept. Anyone interested in working together to create a real decentraled internet operating system with no compromises?
hi -- we were trying to zap you -- but it looks like you haven’t set up a NIP-05 or ⚡ lightning address yet — grab one free at https://rizful.com .. then pls reply here and we will try zapping you...