Dude I keep telling you I know in person a bunch of women who are very capable fighters. For most women the difference between being able to physically beat most untrained man and not is just down to the willingness to put in the time and train themselves. It is not extreme examples either, regular everyday looking soccer moms who just put in the time and effort to learn the skill of fighting.
I am an active martial artist training in a martial art that works. You clearly are not. What level of delusion does it take to be so certain you know more about who can and who can't fight than the guy who spars for hours every week and has for years? I promise you I am not a small man and I had this lesson literally beat into me by women half my size when I started.
BTW I did read all your posts and the backtracking is very clear. This one sure is a long ass way from every female in a police or military uniform is a DEI hire. You were so eager to spout your sexism you forgot that the military is so big it has HR and nurses, traditionally female jobs, who work in uniform but never go into combat.
Thanks. I've gotten sick of how the vibe here is allegedly anti government but every time I turn around someone is putting right wing news script BS into my comments and feed. Time to choose violence.
The right people will stick around. I'm not worried about my follower count.
Yeah, the right was a nice refuge for me for a while after October 7, but the weird shit on that side has gotten extreme too. I’m embracing being politically homeless. Camp Distrust The Government is still small, I guess 🤷♀️
Look up agorism, we might be a home for you.
I lean right though 🤷♀️ on libertarianism
I used to. Then 2 points pushed me farther.
1. Historically every government grows until it collapses in on itself. Any limited government today is just a monster waiting to grow up and be a massive government for our children and grandchildren.
2. Basically think of it like informed consent from #metoo but applied to all human interactions. All governments continuously use force to get compliance from unwilling citizens which is immoral. You can't do a moral good by giving to charity if your only means of getting that money is armed robbery.
It was a long journey and one comment didn't do it for me either.
Nostr has the highest per capita agorists of any place I know of. Watch and see them speak for themselves for a while. Who is kinder in interactions? Who holds positions that seem most rational and coherent to you?
Having true confidence I'm right gives me the ability to not be impatient or try to force my beliefs on you or anyone else. You'll see it when you are ready if you are ready some day.
Thread collapsed
There is an unfortunate amount of naïveté in utopian Libertarianism, as if the absence of the state isn’t simply an invitation for authoritarians to roll in and conquer them.
Precisely. Humans will always compose a heirachy. There is no liberty without order. How the order is implemented is important for liberty.
Thread collapsed
I agree with this. It will mean more personal responsibility. It will not be a utopia that guarantees you happiness.
It is a demand that the base of societies interaction starts with consent instead of the threat of violence. It is the belief that a society not built on a foundation of violence is morally superior to one that is.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
You missed the whole point again...
You keep changing it as you backtrack.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Combat positions was clearly meant to be inferred in military. I'm not backtracking. You keep calling me sexist. Can you please defend that claim. I don't take it lightly.
If you don't like being called sexist then you should think harder before saying "all women"
At some point you say some sexist shit and get called for it. Been there believe me. Now you have to decide to abandon the sexist belief or admit you are going to carry on being knowingly sexist. Choose wisely.
Usually if someone says "men are stronger than women" they obviously mean most. You are using a 3rd grade argument so far to justify your claim that I'm sexist. Your argument "you didn't explicitly state that there are women that exist that can beat most men, therefore you must be sexist assuming you think every man is superior to a woman in this way"
Gunna have to do better than that. Please back up your claim that I'm sexist.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed