"Mrs. Rothschild refused to leave Lifeboat 6 without her Pomeranian, so the crew eventually complied and hoisted her aboard while she held onto the dog."
that reminds me of Afghanistan
Discussion
the woman who wouldnt leave w/o also trying to strongarm the evac of her rescues
causing a diplomatic incident and a lot of hassle
on twitter at the time
i said
i would have shot that puppy on the tarmac and dragged her on board
inference: that this is why i am not a soldier in the military
because my decision making about shit like this can get way too extreme in times of crisis
im pretty sure it is an extension of a
self loathing thing
cos like, in my heart i would be on the tarmac with a puppy
but in actual world: the world does not stop for a puppy and it is insane to demand it that it does
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animals_aboard_the_Titanic
i simply do not trust this article in its entirety
i am engaging with it like it is a pleasant fiction math problem and writing prompt
if i do not trust this article that means what
i dont trust wikipedia, i dont trust the editors of wikipedia although i do trust one editor from wikipedia cos i followed her on twitter for awhile, molly
so if i dont trust wikipedia and i only trust one editor
that's ok cos i can start to verify this article with primary sources
however, who would write this article if it was 'not real' and why
cos that's weird too
who would write a 'fake' article for who
cos if it was for me
that is
idk what that is
am i supposed to thank someone or fight someone like what
fight someone on the grounds of:
why are we putting fake stuff on wikipedia
not fight fight
word fight
who on earth cares about the pets on the titanic
and why is the article written way less dry
it isnt in wikipedia voice
on balance of scales
and i dont mean this in a whatever way
i just mean actual
there is simply no way that someone wrote a fake article on wikipedia for me specifically
no one cares about me that much
so that option is out
it is not that.
it is something else
why is this article psycho
no smithsonian magazine
i cant imagine that cos that is weird as fuck to imagine
no one should ever imagine dying for anyone's dog
the fuck is wrong with the author?
