Chill, bro. Niel is only mocking Catholicism's views on transubstantiation, and poking fun at the modern evangelical (and thinking about it... Cstholic, but for different and more nefsrious reasons) ignorance of more than the common view of God, the devil, angels, demons, and us. Which is, patently, idiotically false, and has pissed me off to no end recently, since that view is responsible for much of what ails "the church" today.
Discussion
I was only a bit pissed at first because it sounded like he was ridiculing Christianity in general. After talking with him, it's not the case, I still disagree with a lot of what he says but at least I think he has done his research and isn't basing his beliefs on lack of knowledge
Yeah, I can see how that would come across as that without context, but, the comment was directed at me, specifically, and I understood it as it was meant.
He's studied, yes, but also is incorrect, as I don't hold to the notion that we are in "the short time of deception" or some of the other common notions that go along with that.
