I wouldnt think so since it comes from the source of existence. Create an imbalance, there will be a response to return to balance. Everything is energy, action-reaction.
Discussion
so this ruler doesn't respect Exit. everyone is his subjects whether they like it or not.
and this somehow squares with anarchy for you? (and not ultimate dictatorship?)
You keep humanizing the laws that govern existence. That I am bound by things that make existence exist has nothing at all to do with anarchy. Again, anarchy is about EARTHLY rulers only. Cosmic laws are irrelevant to any version of anarchy. They are irrelvant to any belief system. They just are. And to imply its akin to a dictatorship is so far off base to the point of being absurd.
if cosmic laws are irrelevant to any belief system, then what is your conception of God? didn't you say earlier that God created the laws and set them in place?
my point is that you are creating this god story, saying he made the rules and that one is not able to opt out of the rules (which is a choice god made - being omnipotent he could have made the rules voluntary. you could imagine a system where an omnipotent god allows different belief sets to be governed by different laws of physics. if he can't create such a system he's not so omnipotent... so clearly he _chose_ not to embed consent at the bottom of reality)
given that you've invented this whole story, it sounds similar to me to inventing the fiction of an "ultra ruler" State, and saying "sure you can have anarchy at the more local levels, but at the top level, we all must be beholden to the ultra-ruler state, because naturally that's the system that underlies all the local layers".
that's not a freedom/anarchy mindset. that's a Statist mindset of the most egregious variety: inventing an ultra state that nobody can escape - like a prison planet.
I'm saying that you **can choose to stop believing that fiction** (just like you can reject accepting the fiction of any state) and actually free your mind. down to the bottom. its like an "anarchist" who rejects local rulers but welcomes federal or global ones. just go all the way.
Whatever dude. Its very clear now you weren't really trying to understand my point so think what you want, I dont give a fuck
you've made your point clear and I understand it now. and above is my reaction to your clearly made point. if you're not interested in hearing my view that's fine, but I don't think I've misunderstood you by this point.
You start talking all this nonsense that I just made everything I said up. What more is there for me to say if that's your opinion of it all?