everything is tradeoffs

if a project prematurely ossifies

but without the features it needs to protect its value proposition,

it's over.

then we can only fork it and start over.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I agree that ossification is a challenge, but I don’t see how it can be entirely avoided. Projects that evolve indefinitely without clear goalposts risk losing users trust. People value predictability. Privacy should be default, stable, and easy to use, not something that requires constant relearning every year.

yeah

there aren't any clear answers are there?

there's room for conversation about governance here also...

its naive to think open source projects don't have de facto governance structures. the greater community pretending its taboo only prevents those "goalposts" you talk about.

it increases unclarity about what function the project serves.

i think this is a problem with both Bitcoin and Monero

but Monero can still kinda get away with it because its so much smaller.

on Bitcoin it just means nothing can change, ie premature ossification.

Be water, my friend. - Bruce Lee

this was my favorite one of those

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APx2yFA0-B4

Bruce Lee’s philosophy and discipline have always resonated with me. 🥋